The Distributed Energy Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright

More from this blogger

view all

Distributed Energy Editor's Blog

  • RSS
  • Save
  • Print
  • Email
Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:23 AM

The Magical, Radical Clean Energy Pill

By: Elizabeth Cutright Comments

Could clean energy reverse climate change? Could continued investment in renewable energy alternatives liberate the world’s poor and put an end to poverty? Could large-scale solar power and hydropower projects increase efficiency and provide cheap, clean power to millions of people all over the world who currently live without access to reliable electricity?

According to UN chief Ban Ki-moon, the “Sustainable Energy for All Initiative” could accomplish all of the above, and more.

“This is the right time for the initiative,” Ban is quoted as saying in an article in this week’s Boston Globe. “Across the world we see momentum building for concrete action that reduces energy poverty, catalyzes sustainable growth, and mitigates climate change. Achieving sustainable energy is both feasible and necessary.”

Ban Ki-moon is calling for international governments and the private sector to ramp up sustainable energy investments because he believes these efforts could fundamentally change the quality of life for billions of people currently living without power.

“Why should energy poverty condemn billions to darkness, to missed opportunities for education and prosperity?” He asks, explaining that, “It is neither just nor sustainable that one in five lacks access to modern electricity. It is not acceptable that three billion people have to rely on wood, coal, or charcoal for cooking and heating. We need to turn on the lights for all households. To do that we need to scale up success examples of clean energy and energy-efficient technology. We need innovation that can spread throughout the developing world where energy demand is growing fastest.”

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who supports the Sustainable Energy for All initiative, acknowledged that China’s position as the world’s largest producer of greenhouse gas emissions has inspired the country to make “sustained endeavors to reduce energy consumption and emission in industrial, transport, and construction sectors”, efforts that have resulted in a 20% decrease in emissions between 2005 and 2010.

“The final solution to any future energy problem does not lie with the possession of energy resources,” Wen is quoted as saying, “but possession of high technology and breakthrough in science and technology. Developed countries with advanced technology should, while protecting intellectual property rights, provide and transfer technologies to developing and underdeveloped countries.”

So what do you think? The government of China has demonstrated a willingness to provide aid to its own domestic burgeoning clean tech industry, so does this statement in support of Ban Ki-moon’s initiative indicate that the Chinese government sees some sort of benefit—beyond humanitarianism—behind providing clean tech to the developing world? Does it seem likely the US will jump on this global clean tech initiative if issues like Iran’s nuclear program are not addressed? And will we see a proliferation of clean tech in the developing world in the same vein as the technology jump that allowed countries to “skip” infrastructure investments in their communication systems when the ubiquity of the cell phone made power lines obsolete?

********

Upcoming Forester University Webinars

January 26th, 2012
5 Steps to Creating a Successful Public Outreach Campaign
Change starts with people. Whether your focus is stormwater pollution, energy conservation, pavement restoration, or recycling, a successful public outreach campaign resonates with your target audience and leads to long-lasting behavior change. Join Erica Hooper of SGA to explore a proven 5-step approach to crafting a successful outreach campaign based on real-world examples of the good, the bad, and the ugly. Read more…

What Do You Think?

LAURENCE WINN

Sunday, January 22, 2012

What UN-ites don't tell you about "sustainability" is that it applies to a global population of one billion, not ten billion. Capital reserves to maintain the present population and its decendants with a uniformly desirable standard of living do not exist on this planet. They know this.

greg Chick

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I think it is vain to think we can stop Climate Change. I am totally into a Solar Powered World, be it from Wind or Bio or whatever, but doing away with Oil Filth is ambitious enough. Sustainability is a must, but then there is the other half of the World living is Sewage laden Water and no education to speak of. we have our work cut out for us. Climate Change is larger than we are.
Greg Chick

Post a Comment

Note from the Editor: The content that appears in our "Comments" section is supplied to us by outside, third-party readers and organizations and  does not necessarily reflect the view of our staff or Forester Media—in fact, we may not agree with it—and we do not endorse, warrant, or otherwise take responsibility for any content supplied by third parties that appear on our website. “All comments are subject to approval

CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code: