Cooling Heels and Cutting Costs
Cooling Heels and Cutting Costs
Sunday, January 01, 2012
By Dan Rafter
For
Salvatore Filardi, not entering into the $33.9 million agreement with NORESCO
would have been fiscally irresponsible.
The guaranteed energy savings agreement, in which
Westborough, MA-based NORESCO will make infrastructure and energy efficiency
changes at the campus of the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMass),
will provide a wide range of financial benefits. Not only will the campus,
located in the municipality of Dartmouth, MA, significantly shave the size of
its energy bills each year, it will also qualify—because of the work performed
by NORESCO—for yearly financial incentives through Massachusetts’ Alternative
Energy Portfolio Standard.
While the arrangement will certainly pay off for UMass
Dartmouth, where Filardi serves as its associate vice chancellor for
administrative services, it also offers evidence of the growing importance that
schools, governments, and corporate building owners are placing on replacing
outdated HVAC systems with newer, more energy-efficient models.
The work at the university includes the installation of a
new gas turbine combined heat and power (CHP) system to replace the school’s
inefficient heating plant boilers. It also includes 18 energy conservation
measures designed to reduce the campus’ energy and water use.
A significant portion of the project, though, includes
upgrades to UMass Dartmouth’s old, inefficient HVAC systems. These upgrades
will significantly boost the school’s energy efficiency, and help, in a time in
which schools across the country are facing often-severe budget cuts, to reduce
the campus’ utility bills.
The best news is that the energy efficiencies generated by
the project along with financial incentives from the local utility company will
eventually cover the costs of the efficiency upgrades at the campus. If the
energy savings fall short of guaranteed levels, NORESCO is contracted to pay
the difference. This eliminates any risk on the part of UMass Dartmouth.
“I think schools that are not managing their energy are
wasting valuable resources,” says Filardi. “When the economy is going through
hard times, and especially as we are a public university and state
contributions are being reduced or flat-lined, it makes it harder to operate
within budget. People need to look for new ways to save money. They have to reduce
costs wherever they can. I don’t think you need an economic slowdown or
difficult times to try to boost the energy efficiency of your HVAC systems—that
should be part of any good facility energy management program.”
The
good news is that Filardi and UMass Dartmouth are far from alone. A growing
number of universities, high schools, municipal governments, and corporations
are seeking either new HVAC equipment or upgrades to existing equipment as a
way to reduce the size of their energy bills.
And
in these difficult economic times, building owners need to reduce their costs
however they can. Improving the efficiency of a building’s HVAC system has the
added bonus of being good for the environment, while also providing a safe and
comfortable workplace for students and employees.
Tammy
Fulop, regional sales director for Schneider Electric, says that building
owners across the country are recognizing that they can achieve big savings
from improving the efficiency of their HVAC systems.
And
this can lead to more sales for manufacturers of highly efficient heating and
cooling equipment.
“In
the markets that we serve, building owners are definitely recognizing this as a
huge opportunity,” says Fulop. “We see the potential for a 20% to 30%
improvement in energy efficiency in many of the older HVAC systems we look at.
A lot of the buildings that we see were built prior to 1999. The owners of
these buildings want more energy efficiency. They want better equipment. They
know that we can help support their initiatives.”
A Holistic Approach to HVAC Efficiency
Andrew Kelley doesn’t
need convincing of the benefits that boosting HVAC efficiency can bring to a
building.
Kelley
is superintendent of Daleville City Schools, in Daleville, AL. In 2009, his
district entered into a performance contract with Schneider Electric to
increase the energy efficiency at his district’s buildings.
The
contract wasn’t cheap; Daleville City Schools paid $571,000 for the efficiency
work that Schneider undertook. But it has paid dividends. The performance
contract guaranteed that Daleville
City Schools would see a savings of
$34,000 every year on their energy costs. And if these savings aren’t reached,
Schneider is contracted to make up the difference.
A portion of that yearly savings can be traced to
efficiency improvements for the district’s HVAC systems. HVAC systems account
for a significant amount of the energy that any building consumes. Making these
systems more efficient, then, is a key strategy in reducing a building’s
overall energy consumption.
“This
was an important project for us,” says Kelley. “Not only have we saved a
significant amount of energy, but our buildings are now more comfortable. This
makes for a better learning environment for our students. Students perform
better when they are comfortable. So do teachers. It really was a good
situation for us. With the guaranteed savings every year, we will pay back the
project costs fairly soon. And now we have a building that is more comfortable
and more conducive to learning.”
Justin Patrick, director for strategy and marketing at
Johnson Controls, says that more of his company’s clients are seeking the same
holistic approach taken at the Daleville City Schools.
Clients want their heating and cooling equipment to
consume less energy. But they’re addressing these needs in the context of
larger energy saving agreements at their buildings. It’s why performance
contracting—in which providers guarantee a certain amount of energy savings
each year from their improvements—has become so important, Patrick says.
“Boosting
the efficiency of HVAC no longer means that you’re just selling equipment to
clients,” he says. “That is more of the entry point just to play in this market
today. At some point, there are diminishing returns as you continue to improve
HVAC equipment. There are theoretical limits to the gains that you can get from
the separate pieces of equipment. Today, succeeding in this marketplace comes
down to who can provide the best long-term energy solutions to their clients.
And, yes, that certainly involves boosting the efficiency of buildings’ HVAC
systems. But it involves a lot more than that, too.”
Several
factors are leading building owners to take a closer look at the efficiency
levels of both their HVAC systems and
their buildings in general.
One
of the drivers, of course, is the cost of energy. As officials at the
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and at the Daleville City Schools
discovered, it often makes sound financial sense to reduce the amount of energy
that HVAC systems are consuming.
“When
customers talk about saving energy, they are really talking about saving
dollars,” says Patrick. “They are looking for someone who can help them
engineer a technical and a financial solution for their buildings.”
Neil Maldeis, energy solutions engineering leader with
Trane, says that building owners today are trying to squeeze as much savings as
they can from their buildings. Performance contracting is one way for owners to
find guaranteed savings.
Governments, school districts, and private-sector
businesses are all struggling today with budget shortfalls. They’re being asked
to provide services while spending as few dollars as possible.
Certain budget cuts are less painful than others. It’s not
much fun to fire staff members or to ask workers to take voluntary pay cuts.
But slicing a building’s energy bills? That’s not painful at all.
Successful
manufacturers of high-efficiency HVAC equipment understand this. And they’re
emphasizing this fact when they try to sell their products to building owners.
“Everything
today has to be financially justified,” says Maldeis. “This holds true whether
building owners are talking about entering into a performance contract or
whether they’re just considering replacing a unit that’s no longer efficient. Everyone
wants to know how much money a move is going to save them. They want to know
what financial impact new equipment or a new efficiency plan is going to have.”
When
it comes to HVAC equipment, the impact is generally significant. That’s because
building HVAC systems are notorious for the amount of energy they consume.
Maldeis says that HVAC equipment, including chillers, air handlers, and pumps,
will usually account for about 40% of the energy costs of operating a building.
“This
means that building owners have big chunks to play with when they are looking
to cut costs by increasing the efficiency of their HVAC systems,” he says.
Selling Efficiency in a Down Economy
But just because HVAC
systems are energy hogs, doesn’t mean that every building owner immediately
recognizes the benefits of increasing their efficiency. It’s true that many
potential clients are turning to performance contracting and HVAC efficiency
boosters to cut their energy bills. Others, though, are spooked by today’s
rough economy. They don’t want to spend money on anything, even projects that
come with a guaranteed payback period.
This
means that selling the benefits of energy efficient HVAC equipment requires a
new kind of skill set today, says Johnson Controls’ Patrick.
Today,
it’s important for manufacturers and sales officials to focus on the holistic
approach to energy efficiency, he adds. Sales staffers have to focus on the
financial benefits that building owners will receive when they take a
whole-building approach to cutting energy costs. This whole-building approach
can include everything from new HVAC equipment, lighting that only switches on
when rooms are occupied, heat that only comes on during certain portions of the
day, digital control systems that give building operators more control of their
facilities, and a host of other efficiency boosters.
The
bad economy has even changed to whom manufacturers have to aim their sales
pitches, Patrick says.
“You
really have to target the right people when you’re making the case for an
efficiency program,” he explains. “It is even more important today to talk to
the CEO, CFO, and CIO about the benefits of a total solution. We have to be
able to explain to them what an investment in higher efficiency is going to
mean to them financially. We have to explain to them just how long the payback
period will take, how fast they’ll be able to have their initial investment
paid off. Today, whoever comes to the table with the best solutions, and does
the best job selling those solutions, will win the business.”
The
good news is that a growing number of building owners have become more
sophisticated in their approach to energy efficiency, meaning that they’ve set
aside dollars in their capital budgets for upgrades to their HVAC systems.
Building
managers are also increasingly mastering the art of selling the benefits of
equipment upgrades and retrofits, too. It’s a skill that’s become important as
owners must explain to their superiors—whether those superiors be the board of
a government entity or the owner of an apartment building—just how soon they’ll
be able to recapture the money that they invest in energy efficiency.
“That
skill comes from a focused effort and a concerted force of will,” says Patrick.
“The person who makes equipment decisions is the person who controls the
wallet. It is a shift in our industry. The manufacturers and the different
energy companies who are winning business are the ones who have the
relationships with those people who are part of the C-suite.”
Josh
Pittman, sales manager with Schneider Electric, points to an efficiency project
that his company recently completed with the Alabama Emergency Management
Agency, as an example of the benefits that HVAC improvements can bring to an important building. The project
also serves as a ready example that Schneider can turn to when pitching their
services to other potential clients.
This
is a key step today in nabbing new business: Manufacturers have to be able to
provide real-life examples of the financial impact that their past HVAC
improvements have brought to building owners.
 |
Photos: Jeff Amram Photography
Specifiers know, clients want their HVAC to consume
less energy as part of a larger energy plan.
|
The
Alabama Emergency Management Agency is an important entity. As its name
suggests, it coordinates relief and emergency services when a disaster strikes
in the state of Alabama. The state governor will report to this building in
emergencies, and government officials use it as a base of operations to make
announcements to the public.
The
building was also an energy hog. Until, of course, Schneider Electric upgraded
its HVAC systems.
As
part of an overall energy efficiency plan, Schneider recommended that the
building’s central HVAC plant be completely gutted. The building made the move
from a four-pump water-cooled system to a two-pump, closed-loop, air-cooled
system.
This
work entailed eliminating the building’s cooling towers. Schneider also
redesigned the building’s HVAC duct and lighting systems to provide additional
space in some of the building’s more cramped quarters.
The
end result? The building is now more comfortable. It’s also far more efficient,
on pace to consume 44% less energy every year.
The
emergency building now also boasts a dry sump cooling system, something made
necessary when Schneider called for the elimination of the building’s
water-cooled system. The dry sump cooling system cools the building’s backup
generator. The building also features a new digital control system that allows
operators to easily control how hot or cool the building will be on any day.
This, too, will result in a more energy-efficient building.
“As
you can imagine, these changes have made a significant impact,” says Pittman.
“Going in a new direction with the two-pump system is far more efficient. There
is also less maintenance involved with this new system. They are now spending a
lot less money to heat and cool their building.”
This
successful project also helps Schneider sell its efficiency services to other
clients. That 44% boost in energy efficiency is an impressive figure, and one
that will catch the ear of many other building owners.
“It definitely helps having an example, a real-life
example, that someone can go visit,” says Pittman. “It helps when you can put
potential clients in touch with people who have already worked with you and
have had success. They can tell their side of the story and explain the benefits
that they’ve received. It brings validity to the program.”
In the Alabama Emergency Management Agency’s case,
Schneider officials can tell potential clients that they improved the comfort
level of the building, freed up more room for the building’s employees and
boosted the site’s energy efficiency by a significant amount.
Having
successful case studies is just one more tool that manufacturers have when
trying to sell their efficiency equipment or close performance contract
agreements.
“To succeed today, you often have multiple conversations
and multiple meetings with potential clients to make sure that everyone is
aligned on the same page,” says Pittman. “We are always as clear as possible
about what we can provide them and how we can support them.”
Fulop
agrees with her fellow employee. With building owners facing more pressure to
cut costs, and to spend as little as possible, it’s important for companies
like Schneider to emphasize the value that their clients will receive if they
sign on for an HVAC efficiency boost.
 |
| Photos: Lincoln Barbour |
 |
HVAC equipment can account for up to 40% of a
building’s energy costs. |
Companies that can clearly spell out the benefits that
their services will bring to building owners and managers have the best chance
at closing deals, Fulop says.
And
those manufacturers that guarantee a certain rate of return on clients’
investments? They have an even better chance to land business in these
economically uncertain times.
“Our clients still have to maintain their buildings,” says
Fulop. “They still have to make sure that their occupants are safe and
comfortable. And they have to do this without interrupting the main services
going on inside their buildings. But our clients are also challenged with lower
tax revenues and lower funding. They are challenged to do with more or less
today. That’s why we always emphasize the return on their investment that
they’ll receive when working with us. We promise them a guaranteed return on
investment, so that they always know when they stand financially. It makes it
easier for them to make a decision. It takes away the risk.”
The
key, though, still remains persistence. Some building owners and managers need
more convincing that boosting the efficiency of their facilities’ HVAC systems
is an important way to cut costs.
This
often requires manufacturers to hold not just one or two meetings but a series
of them with key decision-makers. “It’s all about making them understand the
basics of the overall project,” says Fulop. “There is definitely an education
process involved.”
Maldeis
from Trane says that more building owners and managers today are concentrating
on fixing HVAC equipment when it malfunctions rather than adding new equipment
or updating sometimes-outdated systems. The reason for this is simple: They
don’t have as much money to spend, so they’re taking the band-aid approach until
the economy finally begins a stronger recovery.
Maldeis
considers performance contracting to be a financial tool that, as he puts its,
“helps get things done.”
Thanks
to the guaranteed return on investment that comes with a performance contract,
building owners can more easily gain the funding needed for an energy
efficiency project.
“On the public side, you see a lot of equipment that needs
to be replaced,” says Maldeis. “You see infrastructure inefficiencies and
deferred maintenance. Clients in the public sector are willing to consider
projects when they know they’ll have a guaranteed payback on it in 10, 15, or
20 years. That guarantee provides a financial picture that is far more
acceptable to the boards and councils that need to approve the projects.”
Of course, companies like Trane still face challenges.
It’s especially difficult today to sell efficiency upgrades to clients in the
private sector. This holds true even when manufacturers can guarantee a certain
rate of energy savings every year.
“In
the private sector they want to see payback periods as short as two or three
years. Some are open to five-year paybacks,” says Maldeis. “That’s definitely a
challenge to meet. But the private-sector clients are very focused on the
financials today. Our building projects are competing against other moneymaking
projects for their attention. It’s a challenge.”
Author's Bio: Dan Rafter is a technical writer and frequent contributor to Water Efficiency. |
Advertisement]