The Distributed Energy Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright Elizabeth Cutright Distributed Energy Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Governors Unite
  2. Imbedded Costs
  3. Renewable Innovations
  4. Calculating (and Managing) Impact
  5. Shine a Little Light
  6. Small Tweaks, Big Rewards
  7. Government in Action
  8. Feds Go Onsite
  9. Hit Save Frequently
  10. The Best of Both Worlds
  11. Looking Ahead
  12. Block Party
  13. Are You Ready for Your Backup
  14. CHP Hits Pay Dirt
  15. What About Onsite Wind
  16. Information Is Power
  17. Trash to Treasure
  18. Retro-Smart
  19. The Hospital of the Future
  20. Smart Storage
  21. Smart Grid Solar
  22. The Third Industrial Revolution
  23. Funding Update
  24. Give Me Smart Shelter
  25. Smart Metering
  26. Wireless Data
  27. Are Good Intentions Enough
  28. Winning the Wind-Watt Race
  29. Myths and Legends
  30. Making the Grade
  31. From Thoughts to Action
  32. Situational Awareness
  33. Ahead of the Curve
  34. Distributed Funding
  35. When Green Buildings Go Bad
  36. Innovation In My Own Backyard
  37. Daylight Savings
  38. Managing Power
  39. Those Lazy Days of Summer
  40. Fighting for Funds
  41. Energy Audits
  42. Stars on the Horizon
  43. Planning and Protecting
  44. Biomass Possibilities
  45. Once More Unto the Breach
  46. Standardized Efficiency
  47. The Beach Cities Microgrid
  48. Behavior Modification
  49. Brains and Brawn
  50. The Dark Side of the Smart Grid
  51. The Air Is Electric
  52. Funding on Its Way
  53. Dollars and Decisions
  54. Hit the Ground Running
  55. A Glimpse of the Future
  56. Smart Users
  57. Preparing for the Smart Grid
  58. Leading by Example
  59. Close to Home
  60. Can the Grid and Distributed Energy Coexist
  61. Environmentally Friendly Nuclear Power
  62. Can We Be Saved by the Green Dream Team
  63. Hang Your Stockings and Cross Your Fingers
  64. CHP to the Rescue
  65. Expecting the Unexpected
  66. When There's No Rain on the Plains
  67. Tilting at Windmills
  68. Personal Responsibility Versus Government Action
  69. Revisiting Renewables
  70. Understanding Moore's Law
  71. Energy Rights
  72. Using the Wind and Sun
  73. Biogas on My Mind
  74. Where the (VC) Boys Are..
  75. Silver Lining
  76. Water, Energy, and Decentralization
  77. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

DE Editor's Blog

September 21st, 2009 10:35am PST

Point of Use Generation

Posted By Elizabeth Cutright 1 Comment

As I’ve stated before, the benefits of the smart grid and renewable energy greatly diminish the further energy must travel from the source. First of all, the placement of solar or wind farms in remote locations requires the construction of power lines over large swathes of land, and many times the source or the method of delivery must be laid out over sensitive habitats or national parks. Additionally, under our current system, traditional power lines are an inefficient method of transportation for any energy source—thereby mitigating some of the benefit of using renewable energy to begin with. After all, the further that electricity travels, the more of it is lost along the way. It’s always seemed to me that the smartest future lies in a power system that keeps use close to source while taking advantage of existing infrastructure.

With that in mind, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s executive order increasing California’s renewable energy requirements gave me pause. What seemed like a positive statement at the onset, quickly tumbled into the promotion of the type of inter-state, big energy farm projects that are the antithesis of onsite power and energy efficiency.

In a statement, Schwarzenegger says, “I’m totally against protectionist policies because it never works…. You have to understand that we get our water from outside California. We get it from the Colorado River, for instance. Why can we get the water from the Colorado River, but we can’t get renewable energy from outside the state?”

The idea is that energy—like water—should not have to be tied to a local source. The governor welcomes “clean energy” imported from other states with an eye on keeping electricity costs down, but what about the expenses associated—both in money and resources—with building and managing the infrastructure needed to transport that energy? Clean energy imported from other states was welcome, the governor says, to keep down electricity prices, but what if the cheapest way is also the least efficient—won’t we be paying for those inefficiencies in the long run?

What do you think? Does the importation of renewable energy have the potential to spur competition and lower prices? Or should efficiency trump budgetary concerns and free market ideologies?

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

WD8CDH

September 23rd, 2009 10:12 AM PT

Power transmission is not as inefficient as many people think. The combination of transmission and distribution losses and electricity theft is about 7%. Importing green energy is not a bad idea.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!