The Distributed Energy Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright Elizabeth Cutright Distributed Energy Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Imbedded Costs
  2. Renewable Innovations
  3. Calculating (and Managing) Impact
  4. Shine a Little Light
  5. Small Tweaks, Big Rewards
  6. Government in Action
  7. Feds Go Onsite
  8. Hit Save Frequently
  9. The Best of Both Worlds
  10. Looking Ahead
  11. Block Party
  12. Are You Ready for Your Backup
  13. CHP Hits Pay Dirt
  14. What About Onsite Wind
  15. Information Is Power
  16. Trash to Treasure
  17. The Hospital of the Future
  18. Smart Storage
  19. Smart Grid Solar
  20. The Third Industrial Revolution
  21. Funding Update
  22. Give Me Smart Shelter
  23. Point of Use Generation
  24. Smart Metering
  25. Wireless Data
  26. Are Good Intentions Enough
  27. Winning the Wind-Watt Race
  28. Myths and Legends
  29. Making the Grade
  30. From Thoughts to Action
  31. Situational Awareness
  32. Ahead of the Curve
  33. Distributed Funding
  34. When Green Buildings Go Bad
  35. Innovation In My Own Backyard
  36. Daylight Savings
  37. Managing Power
  38. Those Lazy Days of Summer
  39. Fighting for Funds
  40. Energy Audits
  41. Stars on the Horizon
  42. Planning and Protecting
  43. Biomass Possibilities
  44. Once More Unto the Breach
  45. Standardized Efficiency
  46. The Beach Cities Microgrid
  47. Behavior Modification
  48. Brains and Brawn
  49. The Dark Side of the Smart Grid
  50. The Air Is Electric
  51. Funding on Its Way
  52. Dollars and Decisions
  53. Hit the Ground Running
  54. A Glimpse of the Future
  55. Smart Users
  56. Preparing for the Smart Grid
  57. Leading by Example
  58. Close to Home
  59. Can the Grid and Distributed Energy Coexist
  60. Environmentally Friendly Nuclear Power
  61. Can We Be Saved by the Green Dream Team
  62. Hang Your Stockings and Cross Your Fingers
  63. CHP to the Rescue
  64. Expecting the Unexpected
  65. When There's No Rain on the Plains
  66. Tilting at Windmills
  67. Personal Responsibility Versus Government Action
  68. Revisiting Renewables
  69. Understanding Moore's Law
  70. Energy Rights
  71. Using the Wind and Sun
  72. Biogas on My Mind
  73. Where the (VC) Boys Are..
  74. Silver Lining
  75. Water, Energy, and Decentralization
  76. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

DE Editor's Blog

November 10th, 2009 6:43am PST

Retro-Smart

Posted By Elizabeth Cutright Comments

Earlier this fall, in a blog entitled "Give Me ‘Smart’ Shelter", I discussed building envelopes and the push for “smart” buildings—an option made especially viable thanks to ARRA funds earmarked for energy efficiency projects. And while there may not be many new construction projects coming down the pipeline, retrofitting existing structures can still give us a big bang for our buck. That’s because older structures were not always built with an eye towards energy efficiency. By addressing many of the energy sinkholes that plague hospitals, educational facilities, airports, and office buildings throughout the country, we can mitigate some occupant complaints while reducing energy demand.   

And as we all know, energy efficiency is an effective way to cut costs and increase profitability—which is why corporate real estate executives are embracing smart building retrofits. According to a recent report by CNN Money, 74% of corporate real estate companies responding to a 2009 CoreNet Global and Jones Lang LaSalle sustainability survey indicated that they plan on investing in energy and sustainability for their properties. 

Some more interesting results of the survey:

* 70% of corporate real estate executives said that sustainability is a critical business issue for CRE today.

* 89% consider sustainability criteria in making leasing decisions.

* 46% always consider energy labels (such as Energy Star or HPE).

* 4% always consider green building certifications (such as LEED).

* 74% are willing to premium (generally 1–5%) to retrofit owned space for sustainability criteria.

Of course, the survey did reveal that behind this willingness to embrace efficiency and sustainability standards, concerns over funding and implementation exist. More than half of the respondents pointed to a lack of standardized industry metrics to calculate ROI. And many of the respondents pointed out that there are few effective tools for collecting performance data. As Dan Probst, Chairman of Energy and Sustainability at Jones Lang LaSalle, pointed out, “Companies are looking for help in making targeted sustainability investment decisions and measuring the results in terms of both environmental and financial performance. Clarification of industry metrics globally, tools that collect data and turn it into information, and clear methodologies for calculating project ROI will be critical to overcoming these challenges."

So what do you think? Can standards help in this situation? And does it make sense to focus on energy efficiency retrofits for existing buildings when implementation costs may negate any energy savings?

You can see a copy of the survey here and on CoreNet Global’s Web site at www.corenetglobal.org.

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!