May-June 2009

  • 1
  • 2

CHP Thrives in NYC

Twelve microturbines stand as one of the first examples of CHP operations in Manhattan.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Photo: OfficePower

Additional Article Content

By Ed Ritchie

3 Comments


Although their physical presence was minimal, a rooftop installation was still enough to trouble building inspectors that didn’t have much experience with onsite power, and all of the city’s building code requirements. “The main challenge was that it was the first installation of its kind in New York City,” says Wilson.

Con Edison demonstrated a much nimbler approach than the NY Building Department, and Wilson credits the utility with being very helpful during the interconnection process. “They understand the microturbines and the inverter technology, so working with Con Ed here in New York has been good,” he says.

Their enthusiasm proved valuable, because the Capstones were designed to operate both in parallel with Con Edison’s distribution network, or island mode (independent) during grid outages.

Island Mode Protects Customers From Grid Outage
Operating in island mode requires a more complicated interconnection process, but it’s becoming an important selling point for tenants. “An onsite power installation strengthens the building’s energy infrastructure and provides backup resources,” says Wilson. “If that building is competing with another that does not have such resources, the tenant is going to opt for the one that does. Protection from power outages resonates quite a deal with tenants, especially if you think about the kind of customers in these buildings. They tend to have very high-end tenants predominantly in the knowledge industry. The loss of power for even a short period of time can cost them a lot of money.”

Photo: OfficePower
Emergencies aside, the turbines typically operate in a peak shaving mode strategy to optimize the economics of the building’s consumption. In winter months, the turbines can provide a substantial reduction in heating costs. Each turbine has a Capstone heat recovery module, and the system can supply up to 50% of the building’s heating requirements. Heat output per unit is 430 MBtu per hour.

Low Maintenance in a High-Rise
Along with performance, simple maintenance was a key factor in choosing microturbines. “We have no lubricating oil or coolant that needs to be serviced, so it reduces the impact on the building and the environment,” says Crouse. The C60’s maintenance schedule calls for a new air filter at 8,000 hours, an engine injector and igniter change at 20,000 hours, and a powerhead replacement after 40,000 hours of operation.

The turbines have performed with a record of 99.4% availability, so it wasn’t a difficult decision to take advantage of an opportunity to upgrade the units with a new Capstone model; the C65. “The new Capstones allowed us to deploy our new proprietary control system,” says Wilson. “The upgrade took about 10 hours and was absolutely seamless.”

The control system is another major selling point for building owners concerned with the impact a system has on facility operations. It’s all done remotely with no need for onsite personnel. OfficePower’s engineers monitor the system from their computers, and the remote link allows them to operate the system from any location worldwide.

Advertisement

With the benefits of sound economics, reliability, and minimal impact to a building, it’s not surprising that OfficePower has sold similar systems to other buildings in Manhattan. But now there’s one more benefit that tenants want to see.

“The environmental aspects were extremely important to us as a company,” says Wilson. “But now, what we’re doing is better understood and embraced by the real estate community; this is a green solution.”  

Author's Bio: Ed Ritchie is a writer specializing in energy, transportation, and communication technologies.

  • 1
  • 2

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Brzepiela

June 17th, 2009 7:22 AM PT

tszekely, I suggest that you visit the NYSERDA CHP website and do a little poking around. You may want to visit the Tecogen site as well they have case studies that date back to the early 90's. As for the reliability of recip's or microturbines the debate can go on for years but, for efficiency (thermal,electrical and footprint) and bang for the buck I tend to lean towards recip's.

tszekely

June 8th, 2009 12:12 PM PT

Yeah and it was at Kings Plaza shopping center in Brooklyn a decade or two before that, Brzepiea, but those were monster machines, technonogy changes, and ANY jet engine is more reliable than ANY recip., so I don't know what kind of microtrubines you got from where.

Brzepiela

May 8th, 2009 2:28 PM PT

Who are you kidding! CHP has been in Manhattan for about 15-20 years now and most certainly it was not started by a microturbine. Also where are you getting the 99.4% uptime performance stat? Most microturbines I have come face to face with were either inoperatable or on the scrap pile.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!