November-December 2007

The New Cool at School

One high school’s energy-storage system is chillin’.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Lori Lovely

Comments


There are two basic strategies for charging/discharging (cooling) storage to meet cooling demand during peak hours. Load shifting is a full-storage strategy that shifts the entire on-peak cooling load to off-peak hours. It is especially beneficial where on-peak demand charges are particularly high. Tank capacity must be sufficient to meet the entire energy requirement and chiller capacity must be sufficient to recharge the tank overnight.

With a partial-storage strategy, a smaller chiller and tank are adequate, with the chiller plant providing part of the peak cooling load. Partial storage systems may be operated as load-leveling or demand-limiting. In a load-leveling system, the chiller is appropriately sized to operate at full capacity for 24 hours on the hottest day; it is effective in areas where peak cooling load is higher than the average load. In a demand-limiting system, the chiller operates at reduced capacity during on-peak hours and can be controlled to limit a facility’s peak maximum demand charge.

ISS Passes the Test
Thermal storage is an economics-driven strategy with the objective of reducing on-peak electricity demand. Summertime peak loads drive the electricity generation industry, which meets those peak loads with low-efficiency peaking power plants that have high fuel costs. Because electricity consumed during overnight off-peak hours can be produced at much lower cost, many utility companies pass along the savings to customers in the form of time of use (TOU) or real-time pricing (RTP) rates. TOU tariffs are the lowest-cost tariffs—typically an off-peak, overnight time.

Thermal storage has remained an effective way of cooling for decades.

“Most utility rates penalize peak usage,” offers Spence. “Utility companies prefer flat rate usage because it costs them more to make electricity during the day than at night.” He explains that because companies buy electricity on contact, they’re in a more advantageous position to negotiate a better rate if they load-shed.

HVAC units, particularly in large commercial and public buildings, contribute heavily to peak electrical loads on hot days, driving up utility costs for businesses and schools. “Large buildings are typically cooled by low-temperature water that is generated in a central location and distributed to equipment that uses the cold water to make cold air for the rooms,” Spence describes a conventional cooling system. “The large water coolers called ‘liquid chillers’ use large quantities of energy due to size and ventilation requirements. This results in five-figure monthly energy bills during the cooling season.” It also presents opportunities for energy savings by incorporating ISS technology.

Not only do they take advantage of lower off-peak rates, ice-storage systems offset the cost of energy consumption by producing lower condensation temperatures. Although an ISS requires the lowest evaporator temperatures, nighttime operation improves the efficiency of chillers, particularly air-cooled chillers. Because heat is discharged into cooler nighttime air, chillers are more efficient. Chiller efficiency is also improved by operating around the clock because it reduces partial-load losses.

Additional savings can be found by supplying near-freezing water to air-handling units, cooling returning air up to 40% and thus requiring less cooled air. The reduction in airflow allows the use of smaller, less-expensive air handlers and ducting. It also reduces power consumption by ventilation fans. In addition, the cooler air reduces humidity, which improves comfort and provides other advantages. “Humidity causes mold and renders buildings unusable,” Spence elaborates. “St. Charles had to close its new high school due to mold. Dehumidification through lower temperatures helps alleviate maintenance, health, and environmental issues.”

In addition to the direct benefits, lower energy consumption equates to lower emissions and reduced environmental impact. By shifting loads from low-efficiency peaking generators during the day to high-efficiency baseload generators at night, ice storage reduces fossil-fuel use and air pollution. When coal and uranium are used to produce electricity at night, less imported fuel is consumed. Also, because inefficient “peaker” plants are replaced by low-emission baseload facilities producing electricity overnight, emissions are further reduced. Compounding that benefit, by lessening the load factor on electricity plants during peak hours, fewer plants are needed to service the load.

Apply Ice
“The idea came from Metro,” Bumbales recalls. “They educated us on the product; their expertise drove the decision.” After touring a smaller school with a thermal storage system and analyzing energy consumption data, the assistant superintendent asked Metro to calculate long-term costs and payback time.

In business since 1988, Metro has recently designed systems for eight elementary schools and a new high school and has upgraded or expanded systems in three other high schools. In fact, 70% of its work is in the school market, although Kozanecki indicates the company is “getting into high-performance buildings.” Silver LEED-certified projects have garnered attention for the Elgin, IL–based company that bills $3.5 million in design fees per year.

“We’ve done ice storage before,” Kozanecki sums up. “We always tailor the system to the building; they’re all different.” The amount of cooling required can change in different climates. In Arizona, for instance, more ice-storage tanks might be needed due to the sheer demand change and a different load profile. The system helps in warmer climates because more load can be shed to ice banks, providing more payback. “The more cooling capacity you need, the more advantageous the system is.”

For Hampshire High School, Metro “did a comprehensive load system analysis with our design software to find the peak system load,” Kozanecki details. “That gives us the required amount of diversified tonnage for the building to develop capacity cooling. We needed 1,000 tons of cooling to satisfy the load requirement on that day; that determined how much cooling we needed. We took that information, profiled it, and extrapolated it to determine how many tanks we needed to meet capacity for building conditions such as occupancy. With 100% capacity chillers, we need 1,000 tons of cooling for occupancy comfort in the building.”

The system Metro came up with includes six cells of three Calmac 1500 ice tanks and two Trane RTAC 300 rotary-screw chillers of 300 tons each. The base bid without ice storage called for two 500-ton chillers, so already, Kozanecki points out, there was a savings by opting for the ISS strategy with smaller chillers.

The dual-temperature Trane chiller functions as the heart of the ISS, operating in standard cooling mode during the day and in ice-making mode at night. The ice is stored in tanks until needed to provide cooling to the building the next day.

Under the partial storage system, the Trane chillers produce a 22°F antifreeze solution at night when energy costs are low. It’s pumped through poly tubing coiled in an insulated tank of a water/antifreeze mix, which partially freezes around the tubes. The clear plastic continuous tubing has no joints, so there are fewer chances of leaks. The ice is then melted during the day, when energy costs are high.

The chillers run to supplement the ice on hotter days, creating “the best balance of first cost and energy savings, resulting in the fastest payback,” according to Spence. On mild days, the ice is used without chillers, providing additional savings.

The chillers may be smaller, but both proposed designs called for the same size chiller yard, Kozanecki points out, although he admits that it’s the ISS design that requires an extra 18 feet in length.

Installation of the chillers on a concrete pad in a courtyard behind the school will take a two-man crew approximately two to three 80-hour weeks to complete, based on previous experience at another high school job, estimates Dean Powrozek, vice president of operations for International Piping Systems, who spent a busy summer coordinating delivery and installation of the ice banks, piping, valves, and pipe valve fittings.

Payday
Installation generates attention, but ongoing routine maintenance can make or break a budget. Typically, ISS is easy on both. In addition to increasing a cooling system’s peak capacity without extra chillers or electricity requirements, a thermal storage system usually lowers capital and maintenance costs.

Advertisement

Even so, maintenance was not an important consideration in making the decision, Kozanecki believes, because there is little difference in the cost of ongoing routine maintenance between the ISS and the standard cooling systems. “Over time, the maintenance cost may be a little less, but it’s really a wash.” He says that chillers under 200 tons provide more cost savings in regards to refrigerant and condensers, but says ice tanks are simple: “Check for water every spring and fill as needed.”

As Spence says, the Calmac ice tanks are passive and “essentially require no professional maintenance.” Because the tank is a “sealed bucket” instead of a pressure vessel, he explains, there is a slight evaporation rate that might require topping off with a solution of water and 3% glycol once a year. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!