November-December 2007

The New Cool at School

One high school’s energy-storage system is chillin’.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Lori Lovely

Comments

When it opens for the 2008 school year, brand-new Hampshire High School in Hampshire, IL, will serve as a model of forward thinking in more ways than one. The approximately 4,000-square-foot building will incorporate a thermal energy storage system that will provide such benefits as reduced operating cost, operational flexibility, and lower hydrogen emissions.

Recognizing that reducing energy consumption benefits the school, community, and environment, Charles Bumbales, assistant superintendent for School District 300, is proud to set a good example by incorporating thermal technology. “We’re committed to a viable long-term solution to provide a good energy management system. This makes tremendous sense,” he says.

Although it makes sense, it nearly didn’t happen, due to financial constraints. Budgets for the new school were set in the 2004–2005 school year, before the cost of materials escalated. “The average per-square-foot amount went up as much as 20% due to the cost of raw materials, such as copper, and to labor contracts,” Bumbales reveals. “Before bidding the project, we had looked at other projects in the area to get an idea, but since we didn’t bid until two to three years after we determined our budget, we had to re-evaluate our bid number.”

Ron Kozanecki, consulting specifying engineer for Metro Design Associates, readily acknowledges the tight budget the school required them to work within. “The school wanted ice storage, but we had to prove to the school and the construction manager that we could do it within budget.”

To prove it, Metro—with the help of district architect Burnidge Cassel Associates—produced two designs, a base bid with a standard system and an alternate bid with the thermal storage system, also called ice storage system (ISS). “We couldn’t go as much as $20 over [budget],” Kozanecki reports. “If the first cost was too high, we couldn’t do it, even if the payback was in two years. The bottom line was the budget.”

“You need to find a balance between the first cost and the energy savings,” advises Dave Spence, Trane account manager. “You can size the tanks and chillers to achieve different goals. A full-storage system would require bigger chillers or more chillers to make ice; that would double equipment costs, but provide more energy savings. With a partial-storage system, energy savings are usually 40% to 60%, with payback in two to three years.”

In the end, the initial cost of the ISS for Hampshire High was $252,180 higher than a cooling system without thermal storage, but it was still within budget, so the school opted for the greener alternative. Kozanecki points out that the life-cycle payback on investment is 2.7 years and that over the life of the system the school district “would be able to realize over $1 million of cost savings with the ice storage system, based on current rates.”

History Class: Thermal Tech 101
Thermal storage isn’t new. According to some sources, the measurement of cooling capacity in “tons” stems from the days when ice was carried down the mountains to be used in cities as a coolant: one ton of cooling capacity equaled the amount of heat required to melt one ton of ice in a 24-hour period. These days, mechanical refrigeration has replaced ice harvesting, and cooling is measured in Btus. One ton of HVAC capacity equals 12,000 Btus per hour.

Thermal storage has remained an effective way of cooling for decades; in the early twentieth century, ice was placed in air ducts to cool and dehumidify air blown by fans. It wasn’t until the other end of that century that the first ice storage system was built by the Colorado Automatic Refrigerator Co.

Today, thermal energy storage has moved beyond the ice block. It now covers a broader spectrum of technologies to store energy in a thermal reservoir. All the current methods use one of three basic media for cool storage: chilled water, ice, and eutetic salts. One or more of these is incorporated in the many methods of cool storage—chilled water storage, ice thermal storage, ice harvesting, external melt ice-on-coil, internal melt ice-on-coil, encapsulated ice, and ice slurry among them. Water is the most commonly used medium. The choice of storage media determines the size of the storage tank and configuration of the HVAC system. ISSs provide the densest storage capacity but require the most complex charge/discharge equipment.

Advertisement

Although ice thermal storage is still the most common application these days, it involves the storage of cooling energy through production of ice or chilled water at night when utility rates are low. The system then releases that stored energy to cool buildings during the day when the electricity rates are high, thereby reducing utility usage during peak times. This load-shifting technology reduces cooling costs.

The system is successful thanks to water’s high latent heat of fusion, the amount of thermal energy that must be absorbed for one mole of a substance to change states from a solid to a liquid. Special ice-making equipment or standard chillers modified for low-temperature service charge fluid at temperatures below the average operating range of typical air-conditioning equipment. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!