November-December 2009

The Secret of Efficient Generation

CHP in distributed generation applications can add efficiencies to electrical systems.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Lyn Corum

Comments

Roman sawmills dating to the 3rd–6th century AD have been discovered with what might be described as the first, albeit very rudimentary, model for a reciprocating engine. A crank-connecting rod mechanism converted the rotary motion of the waterwheel into the linear movement of the saw blades, according to three authors writing in the Journal of Roman Archaeology, in 2007.

Today, reciprocating internal combustion engines are the heart of generator sets found worldwide in combined heat and power (CHP), or cogeneration, systems, in standby generators and in peaking units. These engines can be run on natural gas or diesel oil in industry, educational institutions, government offices, prisons, and methane or biogas in landfills or farms. The type of fuel always depends on the application.

For example, gas-fired generator sets are the logical choice for CHP applications as company executives discuss below. Diesel-fueled generator sets are often the preferred option for standby units because of their ability to start up quickly. It is critical to keep in mind that, when designing a cogeneration system, the amount of electricity generated should be matched to the thermal load of the building or application if the system is to be economically viable.

Europe has been ahead of North America in CHP products because of differences in regulatory policies. Tariff rates are lower in North America and governments support smaller projects in Europe. Furthermore, farmers in Europe are far more likely to generate power from waste, and biofuel projects are only now catching on with US farmers. This can explain why two of the companies or their products discussed below had a long history in Europe before migrating to North America.

While reciprocating generator sets have long been a staple as standby units and some utilities have installed them to supply power during peak periods, CHP projects have faded in popularity in the past 10 to 15 years in the US, due to a lack of incentives for utilities to buy excess power. Without excess power sales, CHP projects are often not economically viable.

Photo: MTU Onsite Energy
MTU Onsite Energy is seeing increased activity with sales of its generator sets in the Midwest, Midsouth, as well as the mid-eastern corridors from the Carolinas to Washington DC.

However, the Obama administration and many states are now taking measure of the efficiencies CHP in distributed generation applications can add to electrical systems. The US Department of Energy has allocated $156 million in federal stimulus funding for CHP, district energy, and waste energy recovery deployment and demonstration projects.

CHP for Baseload Power
“Going forward, we’re seeing traditional cogeneration and trigeneration business increasing,” says Roger George, general manager for GE’s Jenbacher gas engine business for North America. The market has been volatile, but looking to the future, the need for efficiency and reductions in carbon footprints will improve the market, he says. While there has been a great deal of interest in renewables, “people will be forced to look at natural gas” for efficiency’s sake and cogeneration is the way to do it, adds George.

By 2000, there was almost 20 GW of larger industrial cogeneration in the US. Today, the new markets are with the smaller units, of the 5-, 10-, or 15-MW size in the commercial, industrial, and hospital arenas where electrical prices are high and customers are looking for green solutions to reduce their carbon footprints, George argues. George acknowledges the barriers, but regulators and industry have to see the need for cogeneration. “In Europe, CHP was the first thing they went after, before biogas and renewables,” he says.

Jenbacher reciprocating engines are designed primarily for natural gas, although some are designed for biogas applications. Models start at 300 kW, and the newest model is sized at 4 MW with pure electrical efficiency over 45%. In a cogeneration application it is over 80% efficient, depending on thermal requirements. With trigeneration, in which exhaust heat is used for chilling, efficiency drops slightly to the 70% range.

George says the company has sold units for some selective standby applications, but Jenbacher engines are designed for base load applications. Peaking cogeneration units “are very much in play here” he says, since the engines are designed for varying loads and the response times are very good. “As long as the application is economically justified, we do it all the time.”

Advertisement

Austria-based Jenbacher has been in business for over 45 years. GE bought the company in the early part of this decade. GE Energy Jenbacher now has over 400 units installed in the US, predominantly in industrial applications. About 40% are landfill gas–to-energy projects, and some biogas animal waste projects.

In 1994, Wellesley College in Massachusetts installed four gas-fired 1.4-MW Jenbacher generating sets. A fifth, 1.9-MW unit was added in 1998. Each is equipped with heat recovery to produce steam, medium-temperature hot water, and chilled water. The system provides 97% of the campus’s power, and saved the college over $10 million in energy costs in the intervening years. First-year net savings alone were $936,826. The simple payback was six years. The college has withstood several attempts by the local utility to shut the cogeneration plant down. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!