June 22, 2010

Editorial Advisory Board

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article
2 Comments

Distributed Energy is a complex and wildly diverse topic, and within that context two or more heads are definitely better than one. Our Editorial Advisory Board was formed in order to give our readers the greatest possible coverage of every aspect of distributed energy. In that vein, we have rounded up a variety of experts in the field: men and women who are familiar with onsite power and energy efficiency as it relates to commercial, industrial, and government markets. Please let me take a moment to introduce the distributed energy professionals who have generously agreed to offer their talent and expertise to the Distributed Energy Editorial Advisory Board.—Elizabeth Cutright, editor

David Baldwin
President
Aquarian Technology Systems
Lexington, OH

Jeff Dummermuth
Director, Energy and Engineering
Big Lots Stores Inc.
Columbus, OH

J. Michael Edwards
Principal
Power Recruiting Group
Austin, TX

Justin Fortmeyer, P.E.
Project Manager
Patton Air Conditioning
Fresno, CA

Roger Freeman, Esq.
Ferriter Scobbo & Rodophele, PC
Boston, MA

Gersil N. Kay, IESNA, AIA/HRC, IAEI
Conservation Lighting International Ltd.
Philadelphia, PA

Jim Moxley
Assistant Vice President of Facility Management
Healthsouth Corp.
Birmingham, AL

James W. “JT” Thielman, CFE
Director of Operations –SMG
SeaGate Convention Centre/ Lucas County Arena
Toledo, OH

David Van Holde
Energy Manager
King County, WA

 


What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

randyrawson

October 27th, 2009 9:17 AM PT

I'm sure all these appointees are valuable additions, but your Advisory Board seems to be missing any representation from those most familiar with the technologies that generate the power for DE and CHP, particularly any representation from the equipment/systems manufacturers sector. Users and consultancies provide great perspective, but those most intimately involved with the design, fabrication, installation and operation & maintenance of the power generation equipment involved can provide a technology reality sometimes missed by specifiers alone. After all, it's not what we want to do so much as it is what we can do most cost-effectively and with the greatest results.

glassfiber

July 22nd, 2009 10:23 AM PT

All the members of the Editorial Board look great, but since Lighting could consume 35% of a building's energy, there seems to be missing a lighting designer aware of the most energy efficient lighting tool best suited for the particular application. Only then can sophisticated and affordable design be created within the increasing energy restrictions. Of the three disciplines now regulated in 90.1, Lighting is the easiest to achieve green, sustainable illumination that enhances all design and increases productivity, safety and personal comfort. Gersil N. Kay, IESNA The writer served four years as an appointed lighting designer on the national ASHRAE/IESNA/ANSI project committee on Standard 90.1. She now has "Energy Conservation: engraved on her forehead. Mrs. Kay is on the board of managers of the Philadelphia chapter of IESNA and also on the board of the Greater Philadelphia Professional Builders' Association.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Distributed Energy Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Distributed Energy email newsletter!